Comparison of the Behavior of Concrete and Composite Columns with the Same Mechanical Characteristics under Blast Load

Moayyedi, Mohaddeseh Zahra; Momeni, Mohammad; Aghajanian, Saeed; Mirassi, Sohrab

doi:10.22075/jme.2025.33575.2639

Comparison of the Behavior of Concrete and Composite Columns with the Same Mechanical Characteristics under Blast Load

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Mohaddeseh Zahra Moayyedi ¹

Mohammad Momeni ²

Saeed Aghajanian ¹

Sohrab Mirassi ³

¹ Department of Technology and Engineering, Shahid Ashrafi Isfahani University, Isfahan, Iran

² Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Fasa University, Fasa, Iran

³ Department of Civil Engineering, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran

10.22075/jme.2025.33575.2639

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate the behavior of concrete and composite columns subjected to blast loading through finite element analysis, validated against experiments adopted from the literature. To this end, after validating the finite element model, the behavior of two concrete columns with square and circular sections, and a composite column with a circular section with the same mechanical characteristics was investigated under the effect of blast loading. The results indicate that the greatest damage typically occurs near the columns' supports, with square sections showing higher vulnerability compared to circular sections. Introducing composite column can reduce this damage by approximately 59%, while also effectively decreasing maximum displacement and bending moment by up to 55%. Additionally, a parametric analysis was conducted to identify influential parameters on composite column behavior. The analysis suggests that selecting concrete with a compressive strength of 40 MPa represents an optimal choice for minimizing damage in the investigated columns, as further increases in concrete strength yield marginal benefits in terms of column damage and displacement.

Keywords

Blast load

Composite column

Concrete column

Finite element method

Damage

Subjects

Civil-Structural

[1] Kelliher, D., and K. Sutton-Swaby. “Stochastic Representation of Blast Load Damage in a Reinforced Concrete Building.” Structural Safety 34, no. 1 (2012): 407–417.

[2] Kim, J., and T. Kim. “Assessment of Progressive Collapse-Resisting Capacity of Steel Moment Frames.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research 65, no. 1 (2009): 169–179.

[3] Stylianidis, P., and D. Nethercot. “Modelling of Connection Behaviour for Progressive Collapse Analysis.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research 113 (2015): 169–184.

[4] U.S. Department of Defense. UFC 4-023-03: Design of Buildings to Resist Progressive Collapse. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Defense, 2009.

[5] Burr, W. H. “The Reinforced Concrete Work of the McGraw Building.” Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers 60, no. 1 (1908): 443–457.

[6] Talbot, A. N., and A. R. Lord. Tests of Columns: An Investigation of the Value of Concrete as Reinforcement for Structural Steel Columns. Bulletin No. 56. Urbana: University of Illinois Engineering Experiment Station, 1912.

[7] Brode, H. “Numerical Solutions of Spherical Blast Waves.” Journal of Applied Physics 26 (1955): 766–775.

[8] Newmark, Nathan M., and R. J. Hansen. "Design of blast resistant structures." Shock and vibration handbook 3 (1961): 1-19.

[9] Williams, M. S., and J. P. Newell. “Methods for the Assessment of the Blast Response of Engineering Structures.” In Earthquake, Blast and Impact: Measurement and Effects of Vibration, 176–185, 1991.

[10] Mahin, S. A., V. V. Bertero, M. B. Atalay, and D. Rea. “Rate of Loading Effects on Uncracked and Repaired Reinforced Concrete Members.” In Proceedings of the Fifth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, vol. 1, 1461–1470. Rome, 1973.

[11] Mutsuyoshi, H., and A. Machida. “Properties and Failure of Reinforced Concrete Members Subjected to Dynamic Loading.” Transactions of the Japan Concrete Institute 6 (1984): 521–528.

[12] Cotsovos, D., and M. N. Pavlović. “Numerical Investigation of Concrete Subjected to Compressive Impact Loading. Part 1: A Fundamental Explanation for the Apparent Strength Gain at High Loading Rates.” Computers & Structures 86 (2008): 145–163.

[13] Cotsovos, D., and M. N. Pavlović. “Numerical Investigation of Concrete Subjected to High Rates of Uniaxial Tensile Loading.” International Journal of Impact Engineering 35 (2008): 319–335.

[14] Cotsovos, D., N. D. Stathopoulos, and C. A. Zeris. “Behavior of RC Beams Subjected to High Rates of Concentrated Loading.” Journal of Structural Engineering 134 (2008): 1839–1851.

[15] Li, M., Z. Zong, H. Hao, X. Zhang, J. Lin, and G. Xie. “Experimental and Numerical Study on the Behaviour of CFDST Columns Subjected to Close-In Blast Loading.” Engineering Structures 185 (2019): 203–220.

[16] Zhang, F., C. Wu, X. L. Zhao, Z. X. Li, A. Heidarpour, and H. Wang. “Numerical Modeling of Concrete-Filled Double-Skin Steel Square Tubular Columns under Blast Loading.” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 29, no. 5 (2015): B4015002.

[17] Anas, S., M. Alam, and M. Umair. “Performance of (1) Concrete-Filled Double-Skin Steel Tube with and without Core Concrete, and (2) Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular Axially Loaded Composite Columns under Close-In Blast.” International Journal of Protective Structures 14, no. 3 (2023): 299–334.

[18] Li, M., M. Xia, Z. Zong, G. Wu, and X. Zhang. “Residual Axial Capacity of Concrete-Filled Double-Skin Steel Tube Columns under Close-In Blast Loading.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research 201 (2023): 107697.

[19] Fouché, P., M. Bruneau, and V. Chiarito. “Dual-Hazard Blast and Seismic Behavior of Concrete-Filled Double-Skin Steel Tubes Bridge Pier.” Journal of Structural Engineering 143, no. 12 (2017): 04017155.

[20] Wang, W., C. Wu, and J. Li. “Numerical Simulation of Hybrid FRP-Concrete-Steel Double-Skin Tubular Columns under Close-Range Blast Loading.” Journal of Composites for Construction 22, no. 5 (2018): 04018036.

[21] Wang, R., L. H. Han, X. L. Zhao, and K. J. Rasmussen. “Experimental Behavior of Concrete Filled Double Steel Tubular (CFDST) Members under Low Velocity Drop Weight Impact.” Thin-Walled Structures 97 (2015): 279–295.

[22] Zhang, F., C. Wu, Z. X. Li, and X. L. Zhao. “Residual Axial Capacity of CFDST Columns Infilled with UHPFRC after Close-Range Blast Loading.” Thin-Walled Structures 96 (2015): 314–327.

[23] Ritchie, C. B., J. A. Packer, M. V. Seica, and X. L. Zhao. “Behaviour and Analysis of Concrete-Filled Rectangular Hollow Sections Subject to Blast Loading.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research 147 (2018): 340–359.

[24] Vernardos, S., and C. Gantes. “Experimental Behavior of Concrete-Filled Double-Skin Steel Tubular (CFDST) Stub Members under Axial Compression: A Comparative Review.” Structures 22 (2019): 383–404.

[25] Li, M., Z. Zong, L. Liu, and F. Lou. “Experimental and Numerical Study on Damage Mechanism of CFDST Bridge Columns Subjected to Contact Explosion.” Engineering Structures 159 (2018): 265–276.

[26] Nasiri, E., and Y. Liu. “The Out-of-Plane Behaviour of Concrete Masonry Infills Bounded by Reinforced Concrete Frames.” Engineering Structures 184 (2019): 406–420.

[27] Tahzeeb, R., M. Alam, and S. M. Muddassir. “Performance of Composite and Tubular Columns under Close-In Blast Loading: A Comparative Numerical Study.” Materials Today: Proceedings 65 (2022): 51–62.

[28] Momeni, M., C. Bedon, and M. A. Hadianfard. “Probabilistic Evaluation of Steel Column Damage under Blast Loading via Simulation Reliability Methods and Gene Expression Programming.” Engineering Proceedings 53, no. 1 (2023): 20.

[29] Momeni, M., D. Demetriou, L. Papadakis, C. Bedon, M. F. Petrou, and D. Nicolaides. “Damage Investigation of Blast Loaded UHPFRC Panels with Optimized Mixture Design Using Advanced Material Models.” Results in Engineering 23 (2024): 102518.

[30] Mirassi, S., M. Momeni, and A. Hosseini Moorderaz. “Damage Evaluation of Concrete Bridge with Steel Piers Subjected to Explosive Loads.” Journal of Modeling in Engineering 22, no. 78 (2024): 307–326.

[31] Momeni, M., M. A. Hadianfard, C. Bedon, and A. Baghlani. “Numerical Damage Evaluation Assessment of Blast Loaded Steel Columns with Similar Section Properties.” Structures 20 (2019): 189–203.

[32] Hallquist, J. O. LS-DYNA Keyword User’s Manual. Livermore, CA: Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2007.

[33] Livermore Software Technology Corporation. LS-PrePost Software. Accessed November 5, 2026. https://www.lstc.com/products/ls-prepost.

[34] C., S., J. Woodson, and T. Baylot. Structural Collapse: Quarter-Scale Model Experiments. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1999.

[35] Jayasooriya, R. P., D. J. Thambiratnam, and N. Perera. “Blast Response and Safety Evaluation of a Composite Column for Use as Key Element in Structural Systems.” Engineering Structures (2014): 31–43.

[36] Schwer, L. E., and L. J. Malvar. “Simplified Concrete Modeling with *MAT_CONCRETE_DAMAGE_REL3.” In JRI LS-DYNA User Week, 49–60, 2005.

[37] Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC). LS-DYNA Keyword User’s Manual: Volume II. Version R9.0. Livermore, CA: Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2016.

[38] Momeni, M., C. Bedon, M. A. Hadianfard, and S. Malekpour. “Stochastic Response of Steel Columns Subjected to Lateral Blast Based on Modified Single Degree of Freedom (MSDOF) Method.” Resilient Cities and Structures 4, no. 1 (2025): 1–15.

[39] Momeni, M., C. Bedon, M. A. Hadianfard, and A. Baghlani. “An Efficient Reliability-Based Approach for Evaluating Safe Scaled Distance of Steel Columns under Dynamic Blast Loads.” Buildings 11, no. 12 (2021): 606.