شبیه سازی واحد تصفیه آب ترش در پالایشگاه نفت با در نظر گرفتن جداسازی آمونیاک

نوع مقاله : مقاله شیمی

نویسندگان

دانشکده مهندسی شیمی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اهر، اهر، ایران

چکیده

در این پژوهش به بررسی واحد آب ترش و شبیه­سازی آن و همچنین امکان جداسازی آمونیاک پرداخته شد. واحد آب ترش پالایشگاه­ها معمولا دارای دو برج عریان­سازی به صورت سری می­باشد. نتایج این مطالعه نشان داد که با افرایش میزان جریان حجمی خوراک آب ترش ورودی، جریان مولی NH3 در گازهای خروجی از برج اول افزایش می­یابد. با افزایش دمای خوراک جزمولی NH3 و H2S تا دمای 105 درجه سلسیوس تغییر چندانی نمی­کند و بعد از آن با افزایش دما، جزمولی این دو ماده در گازهای خروجی کاهش پیدا می­کند. با افزایش رفلاکس به برج اول تا حدودm3/hr   9 به شدت میزان جریان مولی گاز NH3 در برج اول کاهش می­یابد که در واقع باعث افزایش خلوص H2S در گازهای خروجی این برج و افزایش جریان این جز در گازهای خروجی از برج دوم می­شود. همچنین،  با افزایش دمای انتهای برج،  جریان مولی NH3 و H2S افزایش می­یابد و در دمای حدود 120 درجه تمامی H2S  موجود در خوراک وارد گازهای خروجی از برج اول شده و آب خروجی از برج اول عاری از H2S می­شود که در نتیجه می­توان نتیجه گرفت که بهترین دما برای ته برج اول حدود 120 درجه سلسیوس می­باشد تا هم تمامی H2S از آب خارج شود و همچنین در برج اول NH3 بیشتر وارد گازهای خروجی از برج نشود .

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Simulation of Sour Water Stripping Unit in Oil Refinery with Consideration of Ammonia Separation

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hassan Shahidi
  • Mehrab Fallahi
Department of Chemical Engineering, Ahar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahar, Iran
چکیده [English]

In this research, the sour water unit and its simulation were investigated. Sour water unit of refineries usually has two stripping towers in series. The results of this study showed that with the increase in the volumetric flow rate of the incoming sour water feed, the molar flow of NH3 in the exit gases from the first tower increases. With increasing feed temperature, the NH3 and H2S do not change much until the temperature of 1050C, and after that, the relative molarity of these two substances in the exhaust gases decreases with increasing temperature. By increasing the reflux to the first tower to about 9 m3/hr, the molar flow rate of NH3 gas in the first tower decreases drastically, which actually increases the purity of H2S in the exit gases of this tower and increases the flow of this component in the exit gases from the second tower. Also, with the increase in the temperature of the end of the tower, the flow of NH3 and H2S increases and at a temperature of about 120 0C, all the H2S in the feed enters the exit gases from the first tower and the exit water from the first tower is free of H2S. As a result, it can be concluded that the best temperature for the bottom of the first tower is about 120 0C so that all the H2S is removed from the water and NH3 does not enter the gases leaving the tower in the first tower.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Simulation
  • Sour water
  • Hydrogen sulfide
  • Ammonia
  • Oil refinery
[1] T. Acheampong and A.G. Kemp. "Health, safety and environmental (HSE) regulation and outcomes in the offshore oil and gas industry: Performance review of trends in the United Kingdom Continental Shelf." Safety Science 148 (2022): 105634.
[2] B. Zamora, and A.S. Kaiser. "Comparative efficiency evaluations of four types of cooling tower drift eliminator, by numerical investigation." Chemical Engineering Science 66, no. 6 (2011): 1232-1245.
[3] L. Matijašević, A. Vučković, and I. Dejanović. "Analysis of cooling water systems in a petroleum refinery." Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Quarterly 28, no. 4 (2014): 451-457.
[4] M.A. Gadalla, A. Mamdouh, A. Ghallab, A.M. Mansour, F.H. Ashour, and H.A. Elazab. "New Efficient Configurations for Sour Wastewater Treatment." Recent Innovations in Chemical Engineering (Formerly Recent Patents on Chemical Engineering) 15, no. 1 (2022): 14-30.
[5] A. Nag. Distillation & hydrocarbon processing practices. PennWell Books, 2015.
[6] M.R. Khan, ed. Advances in clean hydrocarbon fuel processing: Science and technology. Elsevier, 2011.
[7] A.Y. Ibrahim. "Performance assessment of a sulphur recovery unit." Petroleum and Petrochemical Engineering Journal 5, no. 1 (2021): 1-9.
[8] S. Hewlett. "Investigating the potential of industrial waste stream ammonia as a fuel for low carbon, gas turbine power generation." PhD diss, Cardiff University, 2021.
[9] M. Meena, P. Sonigra, G. Yadav, and T. Barupal. "Wastewater treatment techniques: An introduction." Removal of Emerging Contaminants Through Microbial Processes (2021): 161-182.
[10] D. Lee, J.M. Lee, S.Y. Lee, and I.B. Lee. "Dynamic simulation of the sour water stripping process and modified structure for effective pressure control." Chemical Engineering Research and Design 80, no. 2 (2002): 167-177.
[11] A.Y. Ibrahim, F.H. Ashour and M.A. Gadalla. "Refining plant energy optimization." Alexandria Engineering Journal 60, no. 5 (2021): 4593-4606.
[12] J. Bellen. "Design of sour water stripping system." In Proceedings of the 70th Philippine Institute of Chemical Engineers Annual National Convention, Davao City, Philippine, pp. 25-27, 2009.
[13] R.H. Weiland, and N.A. Hatcher. "Sour water strippers exposed." In Laurence Reid Gas Conditioning Conference, Norman, Oklahoma. 2012.
[14] W. Zhi-Qiang, W. Sheng-Yuan, Z. Bing-Jian and C. Qing-Lin. " Simulation, analysis and energy-use improvment of a two-tower sour water srtripping unit." Petroleum Processing and Petrochemicals 43, no. 4(2012):80.
[15] S.Y. Lee, J.M Lee, D. Lee and I.B Lee. "Improvement in steam stripping of sour water through an industrial-scale simulation." Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 21 (2004): 549-555.
[16] C.L. Rhodes. "The process simulation revolution: Thermophysical property needs and concerns." Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data 41, no. 5 (1996): 947-950.
[17] R. Gani and E.N. Pistikopoulos. "Property modelling and simulation for product and process design." Fluid Phase Equilibria 194 (2002): 43-59.
[18] I.D. Chaves, J.R. López, J.L. Zapata, A.L. Robayo and G.R. Niño. Process analysis and simulation in chemical engineering. Cham: Springer, 2016.
[19] P.S. Roy, and M.R. Amin. "Aspen-HYSYS simulation of natural gas processing plant." Journal of Chemical Engineering 26 (2011): 62-65.
[20] C. Matthews. Engineers' data book. John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
[21] R. Schefflan. Teach yourself the basics of Aspen Plus. John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
[22] A. Karimi, H. Soltani and A. Hasanzadeh. "An analysis of increasing the purity of ethylene production in the ethylene fractionation column by the genetic algorithm." Chemical Product and Process Modeling 15, no. 3 (2020): 20190088.
[23] A. Hysys and A.H.C. Guide. "Aspen Technology Inc." Cambridge, MA (2006).